<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<urlset xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9"
        xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9">
  <url>
    <loc>https://tokencost.app/blog/llm-fast-mode-latency-pricing</loc>
    <news:news>
      <news:publication>
        <news:name>TokenCost</news:name>
        <news:language>en</news:language>
      </news:publication>
      <news:publication_date>2026-08-01T00:00:00.000Z</news:publication_date>
      <news:title>OpenAI and Anthropic both charge exactly double for speed. One of them tells you how much speed you get, and no benchmark on earth is allowed to check either claim.</news:title>
    </news:news>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://tokencost.app/blog/gpt-5-6-luna-price-cut</loc>
    <news:news>
      <news:publication>
        <news:name>TokenCost</news:name>
        <news:language>en</news:language>
      </news:publication>
      <news:publication_date>2026-07-31T00:00:00.000Z</news:publication_date>
      <news:title>OpenAI cut GPT-5.6 Luna by 80% and left Sol untouched. That is a 25x spread inside one model family, and it shrinks to 18x the moment you measure real work.</news:title>
    </news:news>
  </url>
</urlset>