Skip to main content
TC
TokenCost

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash

Complete pricing and performance comparison between Anthropic's Claude Haiku 4.5 and Google's Gemini 2.5 Flash.

Quick Verdict

Cheaper
Gemini 2.5 Flash
3.3x cheaper input, 2.0x cheaper output
Larger Context
Gemini 2.5 Flash
1.0M vs 200K
Higher Quality
Claude Haiku 4.5
Score: 31 vs 21
Faster
Gemini 2.5 Flash
231 vs 120 tok/s

Pricing Comparison

SpecClaude Haiku 4.5Gemini 2.5 FlashDifference
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
Input / 1M tokens$1$0.3Gemini 2.5 Flash is 70% more expensive
Output / 1M tokens$5$2.5Gemini 2.5 Flash is 50% more expensive
Context Window200K1.0M5x difference
Max Output8K66K

Performance Benchmarks

MetricClaude Haiku 4.5Gemini 2.5 FlashWinner
Quality Index3121Claude Haiku 4.5
Output Speed120 tok/s231 tok/sGemini 2.5 Flash
Time to First Token0.46s0.42sGemini 2.5 Flash
Value (Quality/$)31.168.7Higher = better value

Benchmark data from Artificial Analysis. Quality Index is a composite score across reasoning, coding, and knowledge tasks.

Cost at Scale

Estimated cost at different usage levels (3:1 input-to-output token ratio, typical for chat).

UsageClaude Haiku 4.5Gemini 2.5 FlashSavings
Single request
1K in / 300 out
$0.0025$0.0010Gemini 2.5 Flash saves $0.0014
10 requests
10K in / 3K out
$0.025$0.010Gemini 2.5 Flash saves $0.015
100 requests
100K in / 30K out
$0.250$0.105Gemini 2.5 Flash saves $0.145
1,000 requests
1M in / 300K out
$2.50$1.05Gemini 2.5 Flash saves $1.45
10,000 requests
10M in / 3M out
$25.00$10.50Gemini 2.5 Flash saves $14.50
1M requests/mo
1B in / 300M out
$2500.00$1050.00Gemini 2.5 Flash saves $1450.00

Pros & Cons

Claude Haiku 4.5 Strengths

  • +Higher quality score (31 vs 21)

Gemini 2.5 Flash Strengths

  • +Cheaper input tokens
  • +Cheaper output tokens
  • +Larger context window (1.0M vs 200K)
  • +Higher max output tokens
  • +Faster output (231 vs 120 tok/s)
  • +Lower latency (faster first token)

When to Use Each Model

Choose Claude Haiku 4.5 for

  • Tasks requiring maximum accuracy and reasoning

Choose Gemini 2.5 Flash for

  • Budget-conscious projects where cost is the primary factor
  • Long documents, large codebases, or multi-turn conversations
  • Generating long-form content or detailed code
  • Real-time applications, chat, or autocomplete

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Gemini 2.5 Flash?
For input tokens, Gemini 2.5 Flash is 3.3x cheaper at $0.3/1M tokens. For output tokens, Gemini 2.5 Flash is 2.0x cheaper at $2.5/1M tokens. At typical usage (1M input + 300K output), Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $2.50 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash at $1.05.
What's the context window difference?
Claude Haiku 4.5 supports 200K context (200,000 tokens), while Gemini 2.5 Flash supports 1.0M (1,048,576 tokens). Gemini 2.5 Flash can handle 5x more context in a single request.
Which model has better benchmarks?
Quality Index: Claude Haiku 4.5 scores 31 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash at 21. Speed: Claude Haiku 4.5 generates 120 tok/s vs Gemini 2.5 Flash at 231 tok/s. Time to first token: Claude Haiku 4.5 at 0.46s vs Gemini 2.5 Flash at 0.42s.
When should I choose Claude Haiku 4.5 over Gemini 2.5 Flash?
Choose Claude Haiku 4.5 when you need: Higher quality score (31 vs 21). Choose Gemini 2.5 Flash when you need: Cheaper input tokens, Cheaper output tokens, Larger context window (1.0M vs 200K), Higher max output tokens, Faster output (231 vs 120 tok/s), Lower latency (faster first token).
How much would 10,000 API requests cost?
At 1K input + 300 output tokens per request (typical chat): Claude Haiku 4.5 = $25.00, Gemini 2.5 Flash = $10.50. At 10K input + 1K output per request (longer conversations): Claude Haiku 4.5 = $150.00, Gemini 2.5 Flash = $55.00.

Related Comparisons