Skip to main content
TC
TokenCost

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Gemini 3 Flash

Complete pricing and performance comparison between Anthropic's Claude Haiku 4.5 and Google's Gemini 3 Flash.

Quick Verdict

Cheaper
Gemini 3 Flash
2.0x cheaper input, 1.7x cheaper output
Larger Context
Gemini 3 Flash
1.0M vs 200K
Higher Quality
Gemini 3 Flash
Score: 35 vs 31
Faster
Gemini 3 Flash
184 vs 125 tok/s

Pricing Comparison

SpecClaude Haiku 4.5Gemini 3 FlashDifference
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
Input / 1M tokens$1$0.5Gemini 3 Flash is 50% more expensive
Output / 1M tokens$5$3Gemini 3 Flash is 40% more expensive
Context Window200K1.0M5x difference
Max Output8K66K

Performance Benchmarks

MetricClaude Haiku 4.5Gemini 3 FlashWinner
Quality Index3135Gemini 3 Flash
Output Speed125 tok/s184 tok/sGemini 3 Flash
Time to First Token0.41s0.80sClaude Haiku 4.5
Value (Quality/$)31.170.0Higher = better value

Benchmark data from Artificial Analysis. Quality Index is a composite score across reasoning, coding, and knowledge tasks.

Cost at Scale

Estimated cost at different usage levels (3:1 input-to-output token ratio, typical for chat).

UsageClaude Haiku 4.5Gemini 3 FlashSavings
Single request
1K in / 300 out
$0.0025$0.0014Gemini 3 Flash saves $0.0011
10 requests
10K in / 3K out
$0.025$0.014Gemini 3 Flash saves $0.011
100 requests
100K in / 30K out
$0.250$0.140Gemini 3 Flash saves $0.110
1,000 requests
1M in / 300K out
$2.50$1.40Gemini 3 Flash saves $1.10
10,000 requests
10M in / 3M out
$25.00$14.00Gemini 3 Flash saves $11.00
1M requests/mo
1B in / 300M out
$2500.00$1400.00Gemini 3 Flash saves $1100.00

Pros & Cons

Claude Haiku 4.5 Strengths

  • +Lower latency (faster first token)

Gemini 3 Flash Strengths

  • +Cheaper input tokens
  • +Cheaper output tokens
  • +Larger context window (1.0M vs 200K)
  • +Higher max output tokens
  • +Faster output (184 vs 125 tok/s)
  • +Higher quality score (35 vs 31)

When to Use Each Model

Choose Claude Haiku 4.5 for

  • Projects already integrated with Anthropic's ecosystem

Choose Gemini 3 Flash for

  • Budget-conscious projects where cost is the primary factor
  • Long documents, large codebases, or multi-turn conversations
  • Generating long-form content or detailed code
  • Tasks requiring maximum accuracy and reasoning
  • Real-time applications, chat, or autocomplete

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Gemini 3 Flash?
For input tokens, Gemini 3 Flash is 2.0x cheaper at $0.5/1M tokens. For output tokens, Gemini 3 Flash is 1.7x cheaper at $3/1M tokens. At typical usage (1M input + 300K output), Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $2.50 vs Gemini 3 Flash at $1.40.
What's the context window difference?
Claude Haiku 4.5 supports 200K context (200,000 tokens), while Gemini 3 Flash supports 1.0M (1,048,576 tokens). Gemini 3 Flash can handle 5x more context in a single request.
Which model has better benchmarks?
Quality Index: Claude Haiku 4.5 scores 31 vs Gemini 3 Flash at 35. Speed: Claude Haiku 4.5 generates 125 tok/s vs Gemini 3 Flash at 184 tok/s. Time to first token: Claude Haiku 4.5 at 0.41s vs Gemini 3 Flash at 0.80s.
When should I choose Claude Haiku 4.5 over Gemini 3 Flash?
Choose Claude Haiku 4.5 when you need: Lower latency (faster first token). Choose Gemini 3 Flash when you need: Cheaper input tokens, Cheaper output tokens, Larger context window (1.0M vs 200K), Higher max output tokens, Faster output (184 vs 125 tok/s), Higher quality score (35 vs 31).
How much would 10,000 API requests cost?
At 1K input + 300 output tokens per request (typical chat): Claude Haiku 4.5 = $25.00, Gemini 3 Flash = $14.00. At 10K input + 1K output per request (longer conversations): Claude Haiku 4.5 = $150.00, Gemini 3 Flash = $80.00.

Related Comparisons