Skip to main content
TC
TokenCost

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs o4 Mini

Complete pricing and performance comparison between Anthropic's Claude Haiku 4.5 and OpenAI's o4 Mini.

Quick Verdict

Cheaper
Claude Haiku 4.5 (input) / o4 Mini (output)
Input: 1.1x diff, Output: 1.1x diff
Larger Context
Claude Haiku 4.5
200K vs 200K
Higher Quality
o4 Mini
Score: 33 vs 31
Faster
o4 Mini
140 vs 125 tok/s

Pricing Comparison

SpecClaude Haiku 4.5o4 MiniDifference
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Input / 1M tokens$1$1.1Claude Haiku 4.5 is 9% more expensive
Output / 1M tokens$5$4.4o4 Mini is 12% more expensive
Context Window200K200KSame
Max Output8K100K
Tokenizercl100k_baseo200k_base

Performance Benchmarks

MetricClaude Haiku 4.5o4 MiniWinner
Quality Index3133o4 Mini
Output Speed125 tok/s140 tok/so4 Mini
Time to First Token0.41s32.98sClaude Haiku 4.5
Value (Quality/$)31.130.1Higher = better value

Benchmark data from Artificial Analysis. Quality Index is a composite score across reasoning, coding, and knowledge tasks.

Cost at Scale

Estimated cost at different usage levels (3:1 input-to-output token ratio, typical for chat).

UsageClaude Haiku 4.5o4 MiniSavings
Single request
1K in / 300 out
$0.0025$0.0024Same
10 requests
10K in / 3K out
$0.025$0.024Same
100 requests
100K in / 30K out
$0.250$0.242o4 Mini saves $0.0080
1,000 requests
1M in / 300K out
$2.50$2.42o4 Mini saves $0.080
10,000 requests
10M in / 3M out
$25.00$24.20o4 Mini saves $0.800
1M requests/mo
1B in / 300M out
$2500.00$2420.00o4 Mini saves $80.00

Pros & Cons

Claude Haiku 4.5 Strengths

  • +Cheaper input tokens
  • +Lower latency (faster first token)

o4 Mini Strengths

  • +Cheaper output tokens
  • +Higher max output tokens
  • +Faster output (140 vs 125 tok/s)
  • +Higher quality score (33 vs 31)

When to Use Each Model

Choose Claude Haiku 4.5 for

  • Projects already integrated with Anthropic's ecosystem

Choose o4 Mini for

  • Generating long-form content or detailed code
  • Tasks requiring maximum accuracy and reasoning
  • Real-time applications, chat, or autocomplete

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or o4 Mini?
For input tokens, Claude Haiku 4.5 is 1.1x cheaper at $1/1M tokens. For output tokens, o4 Mini is 1.1x cheaper at $4.4/1M tokens. At typical usage (1M input + 300K output), Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $2.50 vs o4 Mini at $2.42.
What's the context window difference?
Claude Haiku 4.5 supports 200K context (200,000 tokens), while o4 Mini supports 200K (200,000 tokens). o4 Mini can handle 1x more context in a single request.
Which model has better benchmarks?
Quality Index: Claude Haiku 4.5 scores 31 vs o4 Mini at 33. Speed: Claude Haiku 4.5 generates 125 tok/s vs o4 Mini at 140 tok/s. Time to first token: Claude Haiku 4.5 at 0.41s vs o4 Mini at 32.98s.
When should I choose Claude Haiku 4.5 over o4 Mini?
Choose Claude Haiku 4.5 when you need: Cheaper input tokens, Lower latency (faster first token). Choose o4 Mini when you need: Cheaper output tokens, Higher max output tokens, Faster output (140 vs 125 tok/s), Higher quality score (33 vs 31).
How much would 10,000 API requests cost?
At 1K input + 300 output tokens per request (typical chat): Claude Haiku 4.5 = $25.00, o4 Mini = $24.20. At 10K input + 1K output per request (longer conversations): Claude Haiku 4.5 = $150.00, o4 Mini = $154.00.

Related Comparisons