Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-4o Mini
Complete pricing and performance comparison between Anthropic's Claude Opus 4.6 and OpenAI's GPT-4o Mini.
Quick Verdict
Cheaper
GPT-4o Mini
33.3x cheaper input, 41.7x cheaper output
Larger Context
Claude Opus 4.6
200K vs 128K
Higher Quality
Claude Opus 4.6
Score: 47 vs 13
Faster
GPT-4o Mini
61 vs 56 tok/s
Pricing Comparison
| Spec | Claude Opus 4.6 | GPT-4o Mini | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | OpenAI | |
| Input / 1M tokens | $5 | $0.15 | GPT-4o Mini is 97% more expensive |
| Output / 1M tokens | $25 | $0.6 | GPT-4o Mini is 98% more expensive |
| Context Window | 200K | 128K | 2x difference |
| Max Output | 32K | 16K | |
| Tokenizer | cl100k_base | o200k_base |
Performance Benchmarks
| Metric | Claude Opus 4.6 | GPT-4o Mini | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality Index | 47 | 13 | Claude Opus 4.6 |
| Output Speed | 56 tok/s | 61 tok/s | GPT-4o Mini |
| Time to First Token | 1.77s | 0.58s | GPT-4o Mini |
| Value (Quality/$) | 9.3 | 84.0 | Higher = better value |
Benchmark data from Artificial Analysis. Quality Index is a composite score across reasoning, coding, and knowledge tasks.
Cost at Scale
Estimated cost at different usage levels (3:1 input-to-output token ratio, typical for chat).
| Usage | Claude Opus 4.6 | GPT-4o Mini | Savings |
|---|---|---|---|
Single request 1K in / 300 out | $0.013 | $0.0003 | GPT-4o Mini saves $0.012 |
10 requests 10K in / 3K out | $0.125 | $0.0033 | GPT-4o Mini saves $0.122 |
100 requests 100K in / 30K out | $1.25 | $0.033 | GPT-4o Mini saves $1.22 |
1,000 requests 1M in / 300K out | $12.50 | $0.330 | GPT-4o Mini saves $12.17 |
10,000 requests 10M in / 3M out | $125.00 | $3.30 | GPT-4o Mini saves $121.70 |
1M requests/mo 1B in / 300M out | $12500.00 | $330.00 | GPT-4o Mini saves $12170.00 |
Pros & Cons
Claude Opus 4.6 Strengths
- +Larger context window (200K vs 128K)
- +Higher max output tokens
- +Higher quality score (47 vs 13)
GPT-4o Mini Strengths
- +Cheaper input tokens
- +Cheaper output tokens
- +Faster output (61 vs 56 tok/s)
- +Lower latency (faster first token)
When to Use Each Model
Choose Claude Opus 4.6 for
- →Long documents, large codebases, or multi-turn conversations
- →Generating long-form content or detailed code
- →Tasks requiring maximum accuracy and reasoning
Choose GPT-4o Mini for
- →Budget-conscious projects where cost is the primary factor
- →Real-time applications, chat, or autocomplete
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.6 or GPT-4o Mini?
For input tokens, GPT-4o Mini is 33.3x cheaper at $0.15/1M tokens. For output tokens, GPT-4o Mini is 41.7x cheaper at $0.6/1M tokens. At typical usage (1M input + 300K output), Claude Opus 4.6 costs $12.50 vs GPT-4o Mini at $0.330.
What's the context window difference?
Claude Opus 4.6 supports 200K context (200,000 tokens), while GPT-4o Mini supports 128K (128,000 tokens). Claude Opus 4.6 can handle 2x more context in a single request.
Which model has better benchmarks?
Quality Index: Claude Opus 4.6 scores 47 vs GPT-4o Mini at 13. Speed: Claude Opus 4.6 generates 56 tok/s vs GPT-4o Mini at 61 tok/s. Time to first token: Claude Opus 4.6 at 1.77s vs GPT-4o Mini at 0.58s.
When should I choose Claude Opus 4.6 over GPT-4o Mini?
Choose Claude Opus 4.6 when you need: Larger context window (200K vs 128K), Higher max output tokens, Higher quality score (47 vs 13). Choose GPT-4o Mini when you need: Cheaper input tokens, Cheaper output tokens, Faster output (61 vs 56 tok/s), Lower latency (faster first token).
How much would 10,000 API requests cost?
At 1K input + 300 output tokens per request (typical chat): Claude Opus 4.6 = $125.00, GPT-4o Mini = $3.30. At 10K input + 1K output per request (longer conversations): Claude Opus 4.6 = $750.00, GPT-4o Mini = $21.00.