Skip to main content
TC
TokenCost

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

Complete pricing and performance comparison between Anthropic's Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Google's Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite.

Quick Verdict

Cheaper
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
12.0x cheaper input, 10.0x cheaper output
Larger Context
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
1.0M vs 200K
Higher Quality
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Score: 44 vs 34
Faster
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
230 vs 44 tok/s

Pricing Comparison

SpecClaude Sonnet 4.6Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteDifference
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
Input / 1M tokens$3$0.25Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is 92% more expensive
Output / 1M tokens$15$1.5Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is 90% more expensive
Context Window200K1.0M5x difference
Max Output64K66K

Performance Benchmarks

MetricClaude Sonnet 4.6Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteWinner
Quality Index4434Claude Sonnet 4.6
Output Speed44 tok/s230 tok/sGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Time to First Token1.10s5.17sClaude Sonnet 4.6
Value (Quality/$)14.8134.0Higher = better value

Benchmark data from Artificial Analysis. Quality Index is a composite score across reasoning, coding, and knowledge tasks.

Cost at Scale

Estimated cost at different usage levels (3:1 input-to-output token ratio, typical for chat).

UsageClaude Sonnet 4.6Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteSavings
Single request
1K in / 300 out
$0.0075$0.0007Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite saves $0.0068
10 requests
10K in / 3K out
$0.075$0.0070Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite saves $0.068
100 requests
100K in / 30K out
$0.750$0.070Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite saves $0.680
1,000 requests
1M in / 300K out
$7.50$0.700Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite saves $6.80
10,000 requests
10M in / 3M out
$75.00$7.00Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite saves $68.00
1M requests/mo
1B in / 300M out
$7500.00$700.00Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite saves $6800.00

Pros & Cons

Claude Sonnet 4.6 Strengths

  • +Higher quality score (44 vs 34)
  • +Lower latency (faster first token)

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite Strengths

  • +Cheaper input tokens
  • +Cheaper output tokens
  • +Larger context window (1.0M vs 200K)
  • +Higher max output tokens
  • +Faster output (230 vs 44 tok/s)

When to Use Each Model

Choose Claude Sonnet 4.6 for

  • Tasks requiring maximum accuracy and reasoning

Choose Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite for

  • Budget-conscious projects where cost is the primary factor
  • Long documents, large codebases, or multi-turn conversations
  • Generating long-form content or detailed code
  • Real-time applications, chat, or autocomplete

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite?
For input tokens, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is 12.0x cheaper at $0.25/1M tokens. For output tokens, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is 10.0x cheaper at $1.5/1M tokens. At typical usage (1M input + 300K output), Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs $7.50 vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite at $0.700.
What's the context window difference?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 supports 200K context (200,000 tokens), while Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite supports 1.0M (1,048,576 tokens). Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite can handle 5x more context in a single request.
Which model has better benchmarks?
Quality Index: Claude Sonnet 4.6 scores 44 vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite at 34. Speed: Claude Sonnet 4.6 generates 44 tok/s vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite at 230 tok/s. Time to first token: Claude Sonnet 4.6 at 1.10s vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite at 5.17s.
When should I choose Claude Sonnet 4.6 over Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite?
Choose Claude Sonnet 4.6 when you need: Higher quality score (44 vs 34), Lower latency (faster first token). Choose Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite when you need: Cheaper input tokens, Cheaper output tokens, Larger context window (1.0M vs 200K), Higher max output tokens, Faster output (230 vs 44 tok/s).
How much would 10,000 API requests cost?
At 1K input + 300 output tokens per request (typical chat): Claude Sonnet 4.6 = $75.00, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite = $7.00. At 10K input + 1K output per request (longer conversations): Claude Sonnet 4.6 = $450.00, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite = $40.00.

Related Comparisons