Skip to main content
TC
TokenCost

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro

Complete pricing and performance comparison between Anthropic's Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Google's Gemini 3.1 Pro.

Quick Verdict

Cheaper
Gemini 3.1 Pro
1.5x cheaper input, 1.3x cheaper output
Larger Context
Gemini 3.1 Pro
1.0M vs 200K
Higher Quality
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Score: 57 vs 44
Faster
Gemini 3.1 Pro
120 vs 44 tok/s

Pricing Comparison

SpecClaude Sonnet 4.6Gemini 3.1 ProDifference
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
Input / 1M tokens$3$2Gemini 3.1 Pro is 33% more expensive
Output / 1M tokens$15$12Gemini 3.1 Pro is 20% more expensive
Context Window200K1.0M5x difference
Max Output64K66K

Performance Benchmarks

MetricClaude Sonnet 4.6Gemini 3.1 ProWinner
Quality Index4457Gemini 3.1 Pro
Output Speed44 tok/s120 tok/sGemini 3.1 Pro
Time to First Token1.10s21.32sClaude Sonnet 4.6
Value (Quality/$)14.828.6Higher = better value

Benchmark data from Artificial Analysis. Quality Index is a composite score across reasoning, coding, and knowledge tasks.

Cost at Scale

Estimated cost at different usage levels (3:1 input-to-output token ratio, typical for chat).

UsageClaude Sonnet 4.6Gemini 3.1 ProSavings
Single request
1K in / 300 out
$0.0075$0.0056Gemini 3.1 Pro saves $0.0019
10 requests
10K in / 3K out
$0.075$0.056Gemini 3.1 Pro saves $0.019
100 requests
100K in / 30K out
$0.750$0.560Gemini 3.1 Pro saves $0.190
1,000 requests
1M in / 300K out
$7.50$5.60Gemini 3.1 Pro saves $1.90
10,000 requests
10M in / 3M out
$75.00$56.00Gemini 3.1 Pro saves $19.00
1M requests/mo
1B in / 300M out
$7500.00$5600.00Gemini 3.1 Pro saves $1900.00

Pros & Cons

Claude Sonnet 4.6 Strengths

  • +Lower latency (faster first token)

Gemini 3.1 Pro Strengths

  • +Cheaper input tokens
  • +Cheaper output tokens
  • +Larger context window (1.0M vs 200K)
  • +Higher max output tokens
  • +Faster output (120 vs 44 tok/s)
  • +Higher quality score (57 vs 44)

When to Use Each Model

Choose Claude Sonnet 4.6 for

  • Projects already integrated with Anthropic's ecosystem

Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro for

  • Budget-conscious projects where cost is the primary factor
  • Long documents, large codebases, or multi-turn conversations
  • Generating long-form content or detailed code
  • Tasks requiring maximum accuracy and reasoning
  • Real-time applications, chat, or autocomplete

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Gemini 3.1 Pro?
For input tokens, Gemini 3.1 Pro is 1.5x cheaper at $2/1M tokens. For output tokens, Gemini 3.1 Pro is 1.3x cheaper at $12/1M tokens. At typical usage (1M input + 300K output), Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs $7.50 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro at $5.60.
What's the context window difference?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 supports 200K context (200,000 tokens), while Gemini 3.1 Pro supports 1.0M (1,048,576 tokens). Gemini 3.1 Pro can handle 5x more context in a single request.
Which model has better benchmarks?
Quality Index: Claude Sonnet 4.6 scores 44 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro at 57. Speed: Claude Sonnet 4.6 generates 44 tok/s vs Gemini 3.1 Pro at 120 tok/s. Time to first token: Claude Sonnet 4.6 at 1.10s vs Gemini 3.1 Pro at 21.32s.
When should I choose Claude Sonnet 4.6 over Gemini 3.1 Pro?
Choose Claude Sonnet 4.6 when you need: Lower latency (faster first token). Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro when you need: Cheaper input tokens, Cheaper output tokens, Larger context window (1.0M vs 200K), Higher max output tokens, Faster output (120 vs 44 tok/s), Higher quality score (57 vs 44).
How much would 10,000 API requests cost?
At 1K input + 300 output tokens per request (typical chat): Claude Sonnet 4.6 = $75.00, Gemini 3.1 Pro = $56.00. At 10K input + 1K output per request (longer conversations): Claude Sonnet 4.6 = $450.00, Gemini 3.1 Pro = $320.00.

Related Comparisons