Skip to main content
TC
TokenCost

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Grok 4

Complete pricing and performance comparison between Anthropic's Claude Sonnet 4.6 and xAI's Grok 4.

Quick Verdict

Cheaper
Claude Sonnet 4.6
1.0x cheaper input, 1.0x cheaper output
Larger Context
Grok 4
2.0M vs 200K
Higher Quality
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Score: 44 vs 42
Faster
Claude Sonnet 4.6
54 vs 49 tok/s

Pricing Comparison

SpecClaude Sonnet 4.6Grok 4Difference
ProviderAnthropicxAI
Input / 1M tokens$3$3Same
Output / 1M tokens$15$15Same
Context Window200K2.0M10x difference
Max Output64K16K

Performance Benchmarks

MetricClaude Sonnet 4.6Grok 4Winner
Quality Index4442Claude Sonnet 4.6
Output Speed54 tok/s49 tok/sClaude Sonnet 4.6
Time to First Token1.17s9.39sClaude Sonnet 4.6
Value (Quality/$)14.813.8Higher = better value

Benchmark data from Artificial Analysis. Quality Index is a composite score across reasoning, coding, and knowledge tasks.

Cost at Scale

Estimated cost at different usage levels (3:1 input-to-output token ratio, typical for chat).

UsageClaude Sonnet 4.6Grok 4Savings
Single request
1K in / 300 out
$0.0075$0.0075Same
10 requests
10K in / 3K out
$0.075$0.075Same
100 requests
100K in / 30K out
$0.750$0.750Same
1,000 requests
1M in / 300K out
$7.50$7.50Same
10,000 requests
10M in / 3M out
$75.00$75.00Same
1M requests/mo
1B in / 300M out
$7500.00$7500.00Same

Pros & Cons

Claude Sonnet 4.6 Strengths

  • +Higher max output tokens
  • +Faster output (54 vs 49 tok/s)
  • +Higher quality score (44 vs 42)
  • +Lower latency (faster first token)

Grok 4 Strengths

  • +Larger context window (2.0M vs 200K)

When to Use Each Model

Choose Claude Sonnet 4.6 for

  • Generating long-form content or detailed code
  • Tasks requiring maximum accuracy and reasoning
  • Real-time applications, chat, or autocomplete

Choose Grok 4 for

  • Long documents, large codebases, or multi-turn conversations

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Grok 4?
For input tokens, Claude Sonnet 4.6 is 1.0x cheaper at $3/1M tokens. For output tokens, Claude Sonnet 4.6 is 1.0x cheaper at $15/1M tokens. At typical usage (1M input + 300K output), Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs $7.50 vs Grok 4 at $7.50.
What's the context window difference?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 supports 200K context (200,000 tokens), while Grok 4 supports 2.0M (2,000,000 tokens). Grok 4 can handle 10x more context in a single request.
Which model has better benchmarks?
Quality Index: Claude Sonnet 4.6 scores 44 vs Grok 4 at 42. Speed: Claude Sonnet 4.6 generates 54 tok/s vs Grok 4 at 49 tok/s. Time to first token: Claude Sonnet 4.6 at 1.17s vs Grok 4 at 9.39s.
When should I choose Claude Sonnet 4.6 over Grok 4?
Choose Claude Sonnet 4.6 when you need: Higher max output tokens, Faster output (54 vs 49 tok/s), Higher quality score (44 vs 42), Lower latency (faster first token). Choose Grok 4 when you need: Larger context window (2.0M vs 200K).
How much would 10,000 API requests cost?
At 1K input + 300 output tokens per request (typical chat): Claude Sonnet 4.6 = $75.00, Grok 4 = $75.00. At 10K input + 1K output per request (longer conversations): Claude Sonnet 4.6 = $450.00, Grok 4 = $450.00.

Related Comparisons