Skip to main content
TC
TokenCost

DeepSeek V3.2 (Chat) vs Gemini 3.1 Pro

Complete pricing and performance comparison between DeepSeek's DeepSeek V3.2 (Chat) and Google's Gemini 3.1 Pro.

Quick Verdict

Cheaper
DeepSeek V3.2 (Chat)
7.1x cheaper input, 28.6x cheaper output
Larger Context
Gemini 3.1 Pro
1.0M vs 128K
Higher Quality
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Score: 57 vs 32
Faster
Gemini 3.1 Pro
114 vs 34 tok/s

Pricing Comparison

SpecDeepSeek V3.2 (Chat)Gemini 3.1 ProDifference
ProviderDeepSeekGoogle
Input / 1M tokens$0.28$2DeepSeek V3.2 (Chat) is 86% more expensive
Output / 1M tokens$0.42$12DeepSeek V3.2 (Chat) is 97% more expensive
Context Window128K1.0M8x difference
Max Output8K66K

Performance Benchmarks

MetricDeepSeek V3.2 (Chat)Gemini 3.1 ProWinner
Quality Index3257Gemini 3.1 Pro
Output Speed34 tok/s114 tok/sGemini 3.1 Pro
Time to First Token1.50s24.14sDeepSeek V3.2 (Chat)
Value (Quality/$)114.628.6Higher = better value

Benchmark data from Artificial Analysis. Quality Index is a composite score across reasoning, coding, and knowledge tasks.

Cost at Scale

Estimated cost at different usage levels (3:1 input-to-output token ratio, typical for chat).

UsageDeepSeek V3.2 (Chat)Gemini 3.1 ProSavings
Single request
1K in / 300 out
$0.0004$0.0056DeepSeek V3.2 (Chat) saves $0.0052
10 requests
10K in / 3K out
$0.0041$0.056DeepSeek V3.2 (Chat) saves $0.052
100 requests
100K in / 30K out
$0.041$0.560DeepSeek V3.2 (Chat) saves $0.519
1,000 requests
1M in / 300K out
$0.406$5.60DeepSeek V3.2 (Chat) saves $5.19
10,000 requests
10M in / 3M out
$4.06$56.00DeepSeek V3.2 (Chat) saves $51.94
1M requests/mo
1B in / 300M out
$406.00$5600.00DeepSeek V3.2 (Chat) saves $5194.00

Pros & Cons

DeepSeek V3.2 (Chat) Strengths

  • +Cheaper input tokens
  • +Cheaper output tokens
  • +Lower latency (faster first token)

Gemini 3.1 Pro Strengths

  • +Larger context window (1.0M vs 128K)
  • +Higher max output tokens
  • +Faster output (114 vs 34 tok/s)
  • +Higher quality score (57 vs 32)

When to Use Each Model

Choose DeepSeek V3.2 (Chat) for

  • Budget-conscious projects where cost is the primary factor

Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro for

  • Long documents, large codebases, or multi-turn conversations
  • Generating long-form content or detailed code
  • Tasks requiring maximum accuracy and reasoning
  • Real-time applications, chat, or autocomplete

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.2 (Chat) or Gemini 3.1 Pro?
For input tokens, DeepSeek V3.2 (Chat) is 7.1x cheaper at $0.28/1M tokens. For output tokens, DeepSeek V3.2 (Chat) is 28.6x cheaper at $0.42/1M tokens. At typical usage (1M input + 300K output), DeepSeek V3.2 (Chat) costs $0.406 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro at $5.60.
What's the context window difference?
DeepSeek V3.2 (Chat) supports 128K context (128,000 tokens), while Gemini 3.1 Pro supports 1.0M (1,048,576 tokens). Gemini 3.1 Pro can handle 8x more context in a single request.
Which model has better benchmarks?
Quality Index: DeepSeek V3.2 (Chat) scores 32 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro at 57. Speed: DeepSeek V3.2 (Chat) generates 34 tok/s vs Gemini 3.1 Pro at 114 tok/s. Time to first token: DeepSeek V3.2 (Chat) at 1.50s vs Gemini 3.1 Pro at 24.14s.
When should I choose DeepSeek V3.2 (Chat) over Gemini 3.1 Pro?
Choose DeepSeek V3.2 (Chat) when you need: Cheaper input tokens, Cheaper output tokens, Lower latency (faster first token). Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro when you need: Larger context window (1.0M vs 128K), Higher max output tokens, Faster output (114 vs 34 tok/s), Higher quality score (57 vs 32).
How much would 10,000 API requests cost?
At 1K input + 300 output tokens per request (typical chat): DeepSeek V3.2 (Chat) = $4.06, Gemini 3.1 Pro = $56.00. At 10K input + 1K output per request (longer conversations): DeepSeek V3.2 (Chat) = $32.20, Gemini 3.1 Pro = $320.00.

Related Comparisons