Skip to main content
TC
TokenCost

DeepSeek V3.2 (Chat) vs o4 Mini

Complete pricing and performance comparison between DeepSeek's DeepSeek V3.2 (Chat) and OpenAI's o4 Mini.

Quick Verdict

Cheaper
DeepSeek V3.2 (Chat)
3.9x cheaper input, 10.5x cheaper output
Larger Context
o4 Mini
200K vs 128K
Higher Quality
o4 Mini
Score: 33 vs 32
Faster
o4 Mini
131 vs 34 tok/s

Pricing Comparison

SpecDeepSeek V3.2 (Chat)o4 MiniDifference
ProviderDeepSeekOpenAI
Input / 1M tokens$0.28$1.1DeepSeek V3.2 (Chat) is 75% more expensive
Output / 1M tokens$0.42$4.4DeepSeek V3.2 (Chat) is 90% more expensive
Context Window128K200K2x difference
Max Output8K100K
Tokenizercl100k_baseo200k_base

Performance Benchmarks

MetricDeepSeek V3.2 (Chat)o4 MiniWinner
Quality Index3233o4 Mini
Output Speed34 tok/s131 tok/so4 Mini
Time to First Token1.50s20.84sDeepSeek V3.2 (Chat)
Value (Quality/$)114.630.1Higher = better value

Benchmark data from Artificial Analysis. Quality Index is a composite score across reasoning, coding, and knowledge tasks.

Cost at Scale

Estimated cost at different usage levels (3:1 input-to-output token ratio, typical for chat).

UsageDeepSeek V3.2 (Chat)o4 MiniSavings
Single request
1K in / 300 out
$0.0004$0.0024DeepSeek V3.2 (Chat) saves $0.0020
10 requests
10K in / 3K out
$0.0041$0.024DeepSeek V3.2 (Chat) saves $0.020
100 requests
100K in / 30K out
$0.041$0.242DeepSeek V3.2 (Chat) saves $0.201
1,000 requests
1M in / 300K out
$0.406$2.42DeepSeek V3.2 (Chat) saves $2.01
10,000 requests
10M in / 3M out
$4.06$24.20DeepSeek V3.2 (Chat) saves $20.14
1M requests/mo
1B in / 300M out
$406.00$2420.00DeepSeek V3.2 (Chat) saves $2014.00

Pros & Cons

DeepSeek V3.2 (Chat) Strengths

  • +Cheaper input tokens
  • +Cheaper output tokens
  • +Lower latency (faster first token)

o4 Mini Strengths

  • +Larger context window (200K vs 128K)
  • +Higher max output tokens
  • +Faster output (131 vs 34 tok/s)
  • +Higher quality score (33 vs 32)

When to Use Each Model

Choose DeepSeek V3.2 (Chat) for

  • Budget-conscious projects where cost is the primary factor

Choose o4 Mini for

  • Long documents, large codebases, or multi-turn conversations
  • Generating long-form content or detailed code
  • Tasks requiring maximum accuracy and reasoning
  • Real-time applications, chat, or autocomplete

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.2 (Chat) or o4 Mini?
For input tokens, DeepSeek V3.2 (Chat) is 3.9x cheaper at $0.28/1M tokens. For output tokens, DeepSeek V3.2 (Chat) is 10.5x cheaper at $0.42/1M tokens. At typical usage (1M input + 300K output), DeepSeek V3.2 (Chat) costs $0.406 vs o4 Mini at $2.42.
What's the context window difference?
DeepSeek V3.2 (Chat) supports 128K context (128,000 tokens), while o4 Mini supports 200K (200,000 tokens). o4 Mini can handle 2x more context in a single request.
Which model has better benchmarks?
Quality Index: DeepSeek V3.2 (Chat) scores 32 vs o4 Mini at 33. Speed: DeepSeek V3.2 (Chat) generates 34 tok/s vs o4 Mini at 131 tok/s. Time to first token: DeepSeek V3.2 (Chat) at 1.50s vs o4 Mini at 20.84s.
When should I choose DeepSeek V3.2 (Chat) over o4 Mini?
Choose DeepSeek V3.2 (Chat) when you need: Cheaper input tokens, Cheaper output tokens, Lower latency (faster first token). Choose o4 Mini when you need: Larger context window (200K vs 128K), Higher max output tokens, Faster output (131 vs 34 tok/s), Higher quality score (33 vs 32).
How much would 10,000 API requests cost?
At 1K input + 300 output tokens per request (typical chat): DeepSeek V3.2 (Chat) = $4.06, o4 Mini = $24.20. At 10K input + 1K output per request (longer conversations): DeepSeek V3.2 (Chat) = $32.20, o4 Mini = $154.00.

Related Comparisons