Skip to main content
TC
TokenCost

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs Grok 4-20

Complete pricing and performance comparison between Google's Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite and xAI's Grok 4-20.

Quick Verdict

Cheaper
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
8.0x cheaper input, 4.0x cheaper output
Larger Context
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
1.0M vs 131K
Higher Quality
Grok 4-20
Score: 49 vs 34
Faster
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
230 vs 101 tok/s

Pricing Comparison

SpecGemini 3.1 Flash-LiteGrok 4-20Difference
ProviderGooglexAI
Input / 1M tokens$0.25$2Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is 88% more expensive
Output / 1M tokens$1.5$6Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is 75% more expensive
Context Window1.0M131K8x difference
Max Output66K16K

Performance Benchmarks

MetricGemini 3.1 Flash-LiteGrok 4-20Winner
Quality Index3449Grok 4-20
Output Speed230 tok/s101 tok/sGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Time to First Token5.17s20.69sGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Value (Quality/$)134.024.3Higher = better value

Benchmark data from Artificial Analysis. Quality Index is a composite score across reasoning, coding, and knowledge tasks.

Cost at Scale

Estimated cost at different usage levels (3:1 input-to-output token ratio, typical for chat).

UsageGemini 3.1 Flash-LiteGrok 4-20Savings
Single request
1K in / 300 out
$0.0007$0.0038Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite saves $0.0031
10 requests
10K in / 3K out
$0.0070$0.038Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite saves $0.031
100 requests
100K in / 30K out
$0.070$0.380Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite saves $0.310
1,000 requests
1M in / 300K out
$0.700$3.80Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite saves $3.10
10,000 requests
10M in / 3M out
$7.00$38.00Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite saves $31.00
1M requests/mo
1B in / 300M out
$700.00$3800.00Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite saves $3100.00

Pros & Cons

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite Strengths

  • +Cheaper input tokens
  • +Cheaper output tokens
  • +Larger context window (1.0M vs 131K)
  • +Higher max output tokens
  • +Faster output (230 vs 101 tok/s)
  • +Lower latency (faster first token)

Grok 4-20 Strengths

  • +Higher quality score (49 vs 34)

When to Use Each Model

Choose Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite for

  • Budget-conscious projects where cost is the primary factor
  • Long documents, large codebases, or multi-turn conversations
  • Generating long-form content or detailed code
  • Real-time applications, chat, or autocomplete

Choose Grok 4-20 for

  • Tasks requiring maximum accuracy and reasoning

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite or Grok 4-20?
For input tokens, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is 8.0x cheaper at $0.25/1M tokens. For output tokens, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is 4.0x cheaper at $1.5/1M tokens. At typical usage (1M input + 300K output), Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite costs $0.700 vs Grok 4-20 at $3.80.
What's the context window difference?
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite supports 1.0M context (1,048,576 tokens), while Grok 4-20 supports 131K (131,072 tokens). Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite can handle 8x more context in a single request.
Which model has better benchmarks?
Quality Index: Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite scores 34 vs Grok 4-20 at 49. Speed: Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite generates 230 tok/s vs Grok 4-20 at 101 tok/s. Time to first token: Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite at 5.17s vs Grok 4-20 at 20.69s.
When should I choose Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite over Grok 4-20?
Choose Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite when you need: Cheaper input tokens, Cheaper output tokens, Larger context window (1.0M vs 131K), Higher max output tokens, Faster output (230 vs 101 tok/s), Lower latency (faster first token). Choose Grok 4-20 when you need: Higher quality score (49 vs 34).
How much would 10,000 API requests cost?
At 1K input + 300 output tokens per request (typical chat): Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite = $7.00, Grok 4-20 = $38.00. At 10K input + 1K output per request (longer conversations): Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite = $40.00, Grok 4-20 = $260.00.

Related Comparisons