GPT-5.4 vs Llama 4 Maverick
Complete pricing and performance comparison between OpenAI's GPT-5.4 and Meta's Llama 4 Maverick.
Quick Verdict
Cheaper
Llama 4 Maverick
9.3x cheaper input, 17.6x cheaper output
Larger Context
GPT-5.4
1.1M vs 1.0M
Higher Quality
GPT-5.4
Score: 57 vs 18
Faster
Llama 4 Maverick
130 vs 75 tok/s
Pricing Comparison
| Spec | GPT-5.4 | Llama 4 Maverick | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Meta | |
| Input / 1M tokens | $2.5 | $0.27 | Llama 4 Maverick is 89% more expensive |
| Output / 1M tokens | $15 | $0.85 | Llama 4 Maverick is 94% more expensive |
| Context Window | 1.1M | 1.0M | 1x difference |
| Max Output | 128K | 16K | |
| Tokenizer | o200k_base | cl100k_base |
Performance Benchmarks
| Metric | GPT-5.4 | Llama 4 Maverick | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality Index | 57 | 18 | GPT-5.4 |
| Output Speed | 75 tok/s | 130 tok/s | Llama 4 Maverick |
| Time to First Token | 169.23s | 0.48s | Llama 4 Maverick |
| Value (Quality/$) | 22.8 | 68.1 | Higher = better value |
Benchmark data from Artificial Analysis. Quality Index is a composite score across reasoning, coding, and knowledge tasks.
Cost at Scale
Estimated cost at different usage levels (3:1 input-to-output token ratio, typical for chat).
| Usage | GPT-5.4 | Llama 4 Maverick | Savings |
|---|---|---|---|
Single request 1K in / 300 out | $0.0070 | $0.0005 | Llama 4 Maverick saves $0.0065 |
10 requests 10K in / 3K out | $0.070 | $0.0053 | Llama 4 Maverick saves $0.065 |
100 requests 100K in / 30K out | $0.700 | $0.053 | Llama 4 Maverick saves $0.647 |
1,000 requests 1M in / 300K out | $7.00 | $0.525 | Llama 4 Maverick saves $6.47 |
10,000 requests 10M in / 3M out | $70.00 | $5.25 | Llama 4 Maverick saves $64.75 |
1M requests/mo 1B in / 300M out | $7000.00 | $525.00 | Llama 4 Maverick saves $6475.00 |
Pros & Cons
GPT-5.4 Strengths
- +Larger context window (1.1M vs 1.0M)
- +Higher max output tokens
- +Higher quality score (57 vs 18)
Llama 4 Maverick Strengths
- +Cheaper input tokens
- +Cheaper output tokens
- +Faster output (130 vs 75 tok/s)
- +Lower latency (faster first token)
When to Use Each Model
Choose GPT-5.4 for
- →Long documents, large codebases, or multi-turn conversations
- →Generating long-form content or detailed code
- →Tasks requiring maximum accuracy and reasoning
Choose Llama 4 Maverick for
- →Budget-conscious projects where cost is the primary factor
- →Real-time applications, chat, or autocomplete
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.4 or Llama 4 Maverick?
For input tokens, Llama 4 Maverick is 9.3x cheaper at $0.27/1M tokens. For output tokens, Llama 4 Maverick is 17.6x cheaper at $0.85/1M tokens. At typical usage (1M input + 300K output), GPT-5.4 costs $7.00 vs Llama 4 Maverick at $0.525.
What's the context window difference?
GPT-5.4 supports 1.1M context (1,050,000 tokens), while Llama 4 Maverick supports 1.0M (1,048,576 tokens). GPT-5.4 can handle 1x more context in a single request.
Which model has better benchmarks?
Quality Index: GPT-5.4 scores 57 vs Llama 4 Maverick at 18. Speed: GPT-5.4 generates 75 tok/s vs Llama 4 Maverick at 130 tok/s. Time to first token: GPT-5.4 at 169.23s vs Llama 4 Maverick at 0.48s.
When should I choose GPT-5.4 over Llama 4 Maverick?
Choose GPT-5.4 when you need: Larger context window (1.1M vs 1.0M), Higher max output tokens, Higher quality score (57 vs 18). Choose Llama 4 Maverick when you need: Cheaper input tokens, Cheaper output tokens, Faster output (130 vs 75 tok/s), Lower latency (faster first token).
How much would 10,000 API requests cost?
At 1K input + 300 output tokens per request (typical chat): GPT-5.4 = $70.00, Llama 4 Maverick = $5.25. At 10K input + 1K output per request (longer conversations): GPT-5.4 = $400.00, Llama 4 Maverick = $35.50.