Skip to main content
TC
TokenCost

Grok 4-20 vs o3

Complete pricing and performance comparison between xAI's Grok 4-20 and OpenAI's o3.

Quick Verdict

Cheaper
Grok 4-20
1.0x cheaper input, 1.3x cheaper output
Larger Context
o3
200K vs 131K
Higher Quality
Grok 4-20
Score: 49 vs 38
Faster
Grok 4-20
101 vs 74 tok/s

Pricing Comparison

SpecGrok 4-20o3Difference
ProviderxAIOpenAI
Input / 1M tokens$2$2Same
Output / 1M tokens$6$8Grok 4-20 is 25% more expensive
Context Window131K200K2x difference
Max Output16K100K
Tokenizercl100k_baseo200k_base

Performance Benchmarks

MetricGrok 4-20o3Winner
Quality Index4938Grok 4-20
Output Speed101 tok/s74 tok/sGrok 4-20
Time to First Token20.69s7.97so3
Value (Quality/$)24.319.2Higher = better value

Benchmark data from Artificial Analysis. Quality Index is a composite score across reasoning, coding, and knowledge tasks.

Cost at Scale

Estimated cost at different usage levels (3:1 input-to-output token ratio, typical for chat).

UsageGrok 4-20o3Savings
Single request
1K in / 300 out
$0.0038$0.0044Same
10 requests
10K in / 3K out
$0.038$0.044Grok 4-20 saves $0.0060
100 requests
100K in / 30K out
$0.380$0.440Grok 4-20 saves $0.060
1,000 requests
1M in / 300K out
$3.80$4.40Grok 4-20 saves $0.600
10,000 requests
10M in / 3M out
$38.00$44.00Grok 4-20 saves $6.00
1M requests/mo
1B in / 300M out
$3800.00$4400.00Grok 4-20 saves $600.00

Pros & Cons

Grok 4-20 Strengths

  • +Cheaper output tokens
  • +Faster output (101 vs 74 tok/s)
  • +Higher quality score (49 vs 38)

o3 Strengths

  • +Larger context window (200K vs 131K)
  • +Higher max output tokens
  • +Lower latency (faster first token)

When to Use Each Model

Choose Grok 4-20 for

  • Tasks requiring maximum accuracy and reasoning
  • Real-time applications, chat, or autocomplete

Choose o3 for

  • Long documents, large codebases, or multi-turn conversations
  • Generating long-form content or detailed code

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Grok 4-20 or o3?
For input tokens, Grok 4-20 is 1.0x cheaper at $2/1M tokens. For output tokens, Grok 4-20 is 1.3x cheaper at $6/1M tokens. At typical usage (1M input + 300K output), Grok 4-20 costs $3.80 vs o3 at $4.40.
What's the context window difference?
Grok 4-20 supports 131K context (131,072 tokens), while o3 supports 200K (200,000 tokens). o3 can handle 2x more context in a single request.
Which model has better benchmarks?
Quality Index: Grok 4-20 scores 49 vs o3 at 38. Speed: Grok 4-20 generates 101 tok/s vs o3 at 74 tok/s. Time to first token: Grok 4-20 at 20.69s vs o3 at 7.97s.
When should I choose Grok 4-20 over o3?
Choose Grok 4-20 when you need: Cheaper output tokens, Faster output (101 vs 74 tok/s), Higher quality score (49 vs 38). Choose o3 when you need: Larger context window (200K vs 131K), Higher max output tokens, Lower latency (faster first token).
How much would 10,000 API requests cost?
At 1K input + 300 output tokens per request (typical chat): Grok 4-20 = $38.00, o3 = $44.00. At 10K input + 1K output per request (longer conversations): Grok 4-20 = $260.00, o3 = $280.00.

Related Comparisons