Skip to main content
TC
TokenCost

Grok 4-20 vs o4 Mini

Complete pricing and performance comparison between xAI's Grok 4-20 and OpenAI's o4 Mini.

Quick Verdict

Cheaper
o4 Mini
1.8x cheaper input, 1.4x cheaper output
Larger Context
o4 Mini
200K vs 131K
Higher Quality
Grok 4-20
Score: 49 vs 33
Faster
o4 Mini
148 vs 101 tok/s

Pricing Comparison

SpecGrok 4-20o4 MiniDifference
ProviderxAIOpenAI
Input / 1M tokens$2$1.1o4 Mini is 45% more expensive
Output / 1M tokens$6$4.4o4 Mini is 27% more expensive
Context Window131K200K2x difference
Max Output16K100K
Tokenizercl100k_baseo200k_base

Performance Benchmarks

MetricGrok 4-20o4 MiniWinner
Quality Index4933Grok 4-20
Output Speed101 tok/s148 tok/so4 Mini
Time to First Token20.69s17.25so4 Mini
Value (Quality/$)24.330.1Higher = better value

Benchmark data from Artificial Analysis. Quality Index is a composite score across reasoning, coding, and knowledge tasks.

Cost at Scale

Estimated cost at different usage levels (3:1 input-to-output token ratio, typical for chat).

UsageGrok 4-20o4 MiniSavings
Single request
1K in / 300 out
$0.0038$0.0024o4 Mini saves $0.0014
10 requests
10K in / 3K out
$0.038$0.024o4 Mini saves $0.014
100 requests
100K in / 30K out
$0.380$0.242o4 Mini saves $0.138
1,000 requests
1M in / 300K out
$3.80$2.42o4 Mini saves $1.38
10,000 requests
10M in / 3M out
$38.00$24.20o4 Mini saves $13.80
1M requests/mo
1B in / 300M out
$3800.00$2420.00o4 Mini saves $1380.00

Pros & Cons

Grok 4-20 Strengths

  • +Higher quality score (49 vs 33)

o4 Mini Strengths

  • +Cheaper input tokens
  • +Cheaper output tokens
  • +Larger context window (200K vs 131K)
  • +Higher max output tokens
  • +Faster output (148 vs 101 tok/s)
  • +Lower latency (faster first token)

When to Use Each Model

Choose Grok 4-20 for

  • Tasks requiring maximum accuracy and reasoning

Choose o4 Mini for

  • Budget-conscious projects where cost is the primary factor
  • Long documents, large codebases, or multi-turn conversations
  • Generating long-form content or detailed code
  • Real-time applications, chat, or autocomplete

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Grok 4-20 or o4 Mini?
For input tokens, o4 Mini is 1.8x cheaper at $1.1/1M tokens. For output tokens, o4 Mini is 1.4x cheaper at $4.4/1M tokens. At typical usage (1M input + 300K output), Grok 4-20 costs $3.80 vs o4 Mini at $2.42.
What's the context window difference?
Grok 4-20 supports 131K context (131,072 tokens), while o4 Mini supports 200K (200,000 tokens). o4 Mini can handle 2x more context in a single request.
Which model has better benchmarks?
Quality Index: Grok 4-20 scores 49 vs o4 Mini at 33. Speed: Grok 4-20 generates 101 tok/s vs o4 Mini at 148 tok/s. Time to first token: Grok 4-20 at 20.69s vs o4 Mini at 17.25s.
When should I choose Grok 4-20 over o4 Mini?
Choose Grok 4-20 when you need: Higher quality score (49 vs 33). Choose o4 Mini when you need: Cheaper input tokens, Cheaper output tokens, Larger context window (200K vs 131K), Higher max output tokens, Faster output (148 vs 101 tok/s), Lower latency (faster first token).
How much would 10,000 API requests cost?
At 1K input + 300 output tokens per request (typical chat): Grok 4-20 = $38.00, o4 Mini = $24.20. At 10K input + 1K output per request (longer conversations): Grok 4-20 = $260.00, o4 Mini = $154.00.

Related Comparisons