Skip to main content
TC
TokenCost

Kimi K2.5 vs Mistral Small 4

Complete pricing and performance comparison between Moonshot's Kimi K2.5 and Mistral's Mistral Small 4.

Quick Verdict

Cheaper
Mistral Small 4
4.0x cheaper input, 5.0x cheaper output
Larger Context
Mistral Small 4
256K vs 128K

Pricing Comparison

SpecKimi K2.5Mistral Small 4Difference
ProviderMoonshotMistral
Input / 1M tokens$0.6$0.15Mistral Small 4 is 75% more expensive
Output / 1M tokens$3$0.6Mistral Small 4 is 80% more expensive
Context Window128K256K2x difference
Max Output33K33K

Performance Benchmarks

MetricKimi K2.5Mistral Small 4Winner
Quality Index47--N/A
Output Speed34 tok/s--N/A
Value (Quality/$)78.0--Higher = better value

Benchmark data from Artificial Analysis. Quality Index is a composite score across reasoning, coding, and knowledge tasks.

Cost at Scale

Estimated cost at different usage levels (3:1 input-to-output token ratio, typical for chat).

UsageKimi K2.5Mistral Small 4Savings
Single request
1K in / 300 out
$0.0015$0.0003Mistral Small 4 saves $0.0012
10 requests
10K in / 3K out
$0.015$0.0033Mistral Small 4 saves $0.012
100 requests
100K in / 30K out
$0.150$0.033Mistral Small 4 saves $0.117
1,000 requests
1M in / 300K out
$1.50$0.330Mistral Small 4 saves $1.17
10,000 requests
10M in / 3M out
$15.00$3.30Mistral Small 4 saves $11.70
1M requests/mo
1B in / 300M out
$1500.00$330.00Mistral Small 4 saves $1170.00

Pros & Cons

Kimi K2.5 Strengths

Part of the Moonshot ecosystem

Mistral Small 4 Strengths

  • +Cheaper input tokens
  • +Cheaper output tokens
  • +Larger context window (256K vs 128K)

When to Use Each Model

Choose Kimi K2.5 for

  • Projects already integrated with Moonshot's ecosystem

Choose Mistral Small 4 for

  • Budget-conscious projects where cost is the primary factor
  • Long documents, large codebases, or multi-turn conversations

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.5 or Mistral Small 4?
For input tokens, Mistral Small 4 is 4.0x cheaper at $0.15/1M tokens. For output tokens, Mistral Small 4 is 5.0x cheaper at $0.6/1M tokens. At typical usage (1M input + 300K output), Kimi K2.5 costs $1.50 vs Mistral Small 4 at $0.330.
What's the context window difference?
Kimi K2.5 supports 128K context (128,000 tokens), while Mistral Small 4 supports 256K (256,000 tokens). Mistral Small 4 can handle 2x more context in a single request.
Which model has better benchmarks?
When should I choose Kimi K2.5 over Mistral Small 4?
Choose Kimi K2.5 when you need: a Moonshot ecosystem model. Choose Mistral Small 4 when you need: Cheaper input tokens, Cheaper output tokens, Larger context window (256K vs 128K).
How much would 10,000 API requests cost?
At 1K input + 300 output tokens per request (typical chat): Kimi K2.5 = $15.00, Mistral Small 4 = $3.30. At 10K input + 1K output per request (longer conversations): Kimi K2.5 = $90.00, Mistral Small 4 = $21.00.

Related Comparisons