Mistral Small 4 vs Qwen3.5-9B
Complete pricing and performance comparison between Mistral's Mistral Small 4 and Alibaba's Qwen3.5-9B.
Quick Verdict
Cheaper
Qwen3.5-9B
3.0x cheaper input, 4.0x cheaper output
Larger Context
Qwen3.5-9B
262K vs 256K
Pricing Comparison
| Spec | Mistral Small 4 | Qwen3.5-9B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral | Alibaba | |
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.15 | $0.05 | Qwen3.5-9B is 67% more expensive |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.6 | $0.15 | Qwen3.5-9B is 75% more expensive |
| Context Window | 256K | 262K | 1x difference |
| Max Output | 33K | 33K |
Cost at Scale
Estimated cost at different usage levels (3:1 input-to-output token ratio, typical for chat).
| Usage | Mistral Small 4 | Qwen3.5-9B | Savings |
|---|---|---|---|
Single request 1K in / 300 out | $0.0003 | $0.0001 | Same |
10 requests 10K in / 3K out | $0.0033 | $0.0009 | Qwen3.5-9B saves $0.0024 |
100 requests 100K in / 30K out | $0.033 | $0.0095 | Qwen3.5-9B saves $0.024 |
1,000 requests 1M in / 300K out | $0.330 | $0.095 | Qwen3.5-9B saves $0.235 |
10,000 requests 10M in / 3M out | $3.30 | $0.950 | Qwen3.5-9B saves $2.35 |
1M requests/mo 1B in / 300M out | $330.00 | $95.00 | Qwen3.5-9B saves $235.00 |
Pros & Cons
Mistral Small 4 Strengths
Part of the Mistral ecosystem
Qwen3.5-9B Strengths
- +Cheaper input tokens
- +Cheaper output tokens
- +Larger context window (262K vs 256K)
When to Use Each Model
Choose Mistral Small 4 for
- →Projects already integrated with Mistral's ecosystem
Choose Qwen3.5-9B for
- →Budget-conscious projects where cost is the primary factor
- →Long documents, large codebases, or multi-turn conversations
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, Mistral Small 4 or Qwen3.5-9B?
For input tokens, Qwen3.5-9B is 3.0x cheaper at $0.05/1M tokens. For output tokens, Qwen3.5-9B is 4.0x cheaper at $0.15/1M tokens. At typical usage (1M input + 300K output), Mistral Small 4 costs $0.330 vs Qwen3.5-9B at $0.095.
What's the context window difference?
Mistral Small 4 supports 256K context (256,000 tokens), while Qwen3.5-9B supports 262K (262,144 tokens). Qwen3.5-9B can handle 1x more context in a single request.
When should I choose Mistral Small 4 over Qwen3.5-9B?
Choose Mistral Small 4 when you need: a Mistral ecosystem model. Choose Qwen3.5-9B when you need: Cheaper input tokens, Cheaper output tokens, Larger context window (262K vs 256K).
How much would 10,000 API requests cost?
At 1K input + 300 output tokens per request (typical chat): Mistral Small 4 = $3.30, Qwen3.5-9B = $0.950. At 10K input + 1K output per request (longer conversations): Mistral Small 4 = $21.00, Qwen3.5-9B = $6.50.
Related Comparisons
GPT-5.4 vs Mistral Small 4
$2.5 vs $0.15 per 1M input
GPT-5.4 vs Qwen3.5-9B
$2.5 vs $0.05 per 1M input
GPT-5.4 Mini vs Mistral Small 4
$0.75 vs $0.15 per 1M input
GPT-5.4 Mini vs Qwen3.5-9B
$0.75 vs $0.05 per 1M input
GPT-5.4 Nano vs Mistral Small 4
$0.2 vs $0.15 per 1M input
GPT-5.4 Nano vs Qwen3.5-9B
$0.2 vs $0.05 per 1M input