Best LLM for Cursor
Find the best AI model for Cursor IDE based on coding quality, speed, benchmarks, and cost per session.
Prices on this page last verified against each provider’s own pricing page
Cursor remains the most popular AI-powered code editor for professional developers, and the model you choose behind it makes a meaningful difference in your workflow. Cursor supports all major frontier models through its Pro plan and API integrations, giving you the flexibility to pick the model that best fits your coding style and budget.
The community consensus on the best model for Cursor has shifted again. Claude Sonnet 5, launched June 30, has quickly become the default pick across Reddit, Discord, and developer forums, pairing a full 1M-token context window with strong agent-mode performance at $2/$10 per 1M tokens, a rate Anthropic has confirmed as standard. GPT-5.5 is the premium choice, ranked number one on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index at its April launch, while Grok 4.5, which xAI launched jointly with Cursor in July, is the new value pick built specifically for coding and agent work.
We ranked models based on community feedback, coding benchmarks (SWE-bench Verified, SWE-bench Pro, Terminal-Bench), real-world Cursor usage patterns, and cost per coding session. All prices are read live from our catalogue, and the verification date for this page is stated above.
Top Models for Cursor — September 2026
A strong budget option for Cursor, with a 1M context window, native vision and reasoning effort you can dial from low to max. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash replaced V4 Flash on 10 September 2026 under the model name deepseek-flash at $0.15/$0.60 per 1M off-peak. The figure shown here is the off-peak rate; anything running in the 01:00-04:00 or 06:00-10:00 UTC weekday peak windows costs exactly double, and weekends are off-peak throughout.
The SWE-bench Verified leader at 96.0 and the right choice when you need maximum reasoning for complex multi-file refactors and architectural changes. At $5/$25 with a 1M context window it is worth the premium when getting it right the first time saves hours of iteration. It supersedes Opus 4.8 at an identical price, so 4.8 no longer earns a slot here. A Fast mode tier at $10/$50 offers up to 2.5x output speed, but it is gated and first-party API only.
The community consensus pick for Cursor since its June 30 launch. Sonnet 5 scores 85.2 on SWE-bench Verified, handles a full 1M-token context with no long-context surcharge, and produces clean, well-structured code in Composer and agent modes. It bills $2/$10, and that is the standard rate: Anthropic's pricing docs state the September 1 increase to $3/$15 announced at launch will not occur.
xAI's first model built specifically for coding and agent work, launched July 8, 2026 jointly with Cursor itself. It scores 83.3 on Terminal-Bench 2.1 and 64.7 on SWE-bench Pro, and Artificial Analysis measures it as roughly 4x more token-efficient than Opus 4.8. At $2/$6 it undercuts every other frontier coding model in this ranking.
OpenAI's flagship for Cursor, ranked number one on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index at its April 2026 launch. A 1.05M context window and strong repo-scale reasoning make it the premium choice for large polyglot projects, though a 2x input surcharge applies above 272K context. The newer GPT-5.6 family is now generally available and undercuts it: Terra matches much of this capability at $2/$12.
The fastest model in our ranking with a 1M context window at just $0.50/1M input. Gemini 3 Flash is ideal for iterative Cursor workflows where rapid feedback and broad project context matter more than peak reasoning depth. Note that thinking is on by default and thinking tokens bill as output.
How We Ranked These Models
Order is computed, not hand-picked. Each model is scored on the published pass-rate suites it has (SWE-bench Verified 0.6, Terminal-Bench 2.1 0.4), renormalised over the suites present, then charged 3 quality points for every doubling of its blended price (3:1 input-to-output tokens). Models with no published score are never given one: they are listed after every scored model, ordered by price, and labelled as unscored. Cursor mixes inline editing with Composer and agent runs, so the suites are weighted 0.6 / 0.4. Price presses moderately — 3 points of pass rate per doubling: Pro includes an allowance, but heavy users pay past it, so cost belongs in the order without dominating it. See the full ranking method.
Frequently Asked Questions
The same models, weighted for another tool
Each page states its own weighting, so the order changes with the workload.