Skip to main content
TC
TokenCost

Best LLM for OpenClaw

Find the best model for OpenClaw based on agentic capability, orchestration quality, cost-effectiveness, and community benchmarks.

OpenClaw is an open-source agent framework that lets developers build autonomous AI agents capable of using tools, browsing the web, writing code, and completing multi-step tasks. Because OpenClaw supports any model through its provider-agnostic architecture, choosing the right LLM is critical for agent reliability and cost management.

Agentic workloads are fundamentally different from single-turn chat. Your model needs strong tool-use capabilities, reliable instruction following across dozens of steps, and the ability to recover from errors mid-task. OpenClaw also supports third-party models including free options like Kimi K2.5 directly on the platform, making it possible to run agents at zero cost for many workflows.

Our rankings are informed by community data from the OpenClaw platform, SWE-bench scores, LiveCodeBench results, and real-world agentic benchmarks. We weighted orchestration reliability, coding performance, and cost-per-task heavily since agent workloads can consume hundreds of thousands of tokens per run.

Top Models for OpenClaw in 2026

#1
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
Best Overall
In: $5/1M
Out: $25/1M
Ctx: 200K

The SWE-bench leader and the most reliable model for complex orchestration tasks. Opus 4.6 maintains coherent plans across long multi-step agent workflows and rarely drops context, making it the top choice for mission-critical OpenClaw deployments.

#2
MiniMax M2.5
MiniMax
Best Value
In: $0.15/1M
Out: $0.6/1M
Ctx: 1.0M

The standout value pick for OpenClaw. MiniMax M2.5 delivers Opus 4.5-level benchmark scores at 95% lower cost with a massive 1M context window, making it the most cost-effective model for agentic tasks on the platform.

#3
Kimi K2.5
Moonshot
Best Open Source
In: $0.35/1M
Out: $1.4/1M
Ctx: 131K

Available free on the OpenClaw platform with no API key needed. Kimi K2.5 scores 85% on LiveCodeBench and ranks among the top open-source models for coding, making it an exceptional zero-cost option for many agent workflows.

#4
GPT-5.3 Codex
OpenAI
Best for Coding
In: $1.75/1M
Out: $14/1M
Ctx: 400K

The top model for coding-focused agents in OpenClaw. GPT-5.3 Codex leads SWE-Bench Pro and is purpose-built for code generation and editing, with a 400K context window that handles large codebases across multi-step agent tasks.

#5
DeepSeek R1
DeepSeek
Best Reasoning
In: $0.55/1M
Out: $2.19/1M
Ctx: 128K

Chain-of-thought reasoning makes DeepSeek R1 exceptionally strong for complex debugging and algorithmic problem-solving within OpenClaw agents. At $0.55/1M input, it provides frontier-level reasoning at a fraction of premium pricing.

#6
Llama 4 Maverick
Meta
Best Self-Hosted
In: $0.15/1M
Out: $0.45/1M
Ctx: 1.0M

Open weights and rock-bottom hosted pricing make Llama 4 Maverick the go-to for self-hosted OpenClaw deployments. At $0.15/1M input with a 1M context window, it offers full control over your agent infrastructure at minimal cost.

How We Ranked These Models

Orchestration Reliability
How consistently the model maintains coherent multi-step plans, calls tools with correct parameters, recovers from errors, and chains actions together across long agent loops.
Coding & Benchmark Performance
Scores on SWE-bench Verified, LiveCodeBench, and other standardized benchmarks that measure real-world code generation, bug-fixing, and agentic task completion.
Cost per Agent Task
Total token cost for a typical agentic workflow. Agent tasks consume 100K-500K tokens across multiple rounds, so per-token pricing has a major impact on operational costs.
Community & Platform Data
Rankings from the OpenClaw platform usage data, LM Arena leaderboard scores, and developer community feedback on real-world agent reliability.

Frequently Asked Questions