Skip to main content
TC
TokenCost

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Llama 4 Maverick

Complete pricing and performance comparison between Anthropic's Claude Haiku 4.5 and Meta's Llama 4 Maverick.

Quick Verdict

Cheaper
Llama 4 Maverick
3.7x cheaper input, 5.9x cheaper output
Larger Context
Llama 4 Maverick
1.0M vs 200K
Higher Quality
Claude Haiku 4.5
Score: 31 vs 18
Faster
Llama 4 Maverick
130 vs 125 tok/s

Pricing Comparison

SpecClaude Haiku 4.5Llama 4 MaverickDifference
ProviderAnthropicMeta
Input / 1M tokens$1$0.27Llama 4 Maverick is 73% more expensive
Output / 1M tokens$5$0.85Llama 4 Maverick is 83% more expensive
Context Window200K1.0M5x difference
Max Output8K16K

Performance Benchmarks

MetricClaude Haiku 4.5Llama 4 MaverickWinner
Quality Index3118Claude Haiku 4.5
Output Speed125 tok/s130 tok/sLlama 4 Maverick
Time to First Token0.41s0.48sClaude Haiku 4.5
Value (Quality/$)31.168.1Higher = better value

Benchmark data from Artificial Analysis. Quality Index is a composite score across reasoning, coding, and knowledge tasks.

Cost at Scale

Estimated cost at different usage levels (3:1 input-to-output token ratio, typical for chat).

UsageClaude Haiku 4.5Llama 4 MaverickSavings
Single request
1K in / 300 out
$0.0025$0.0005Llama 4 Maverick saves $0.0020
10 requests
10K in / 3K out
$0.025$0.0053Llama 4 Maverick saves $0.020
100 requests
100K in / 30K out
$0.250$0.053Llama 4 Maverick saves $0.198
1,000 requests
1M in / 300K out
$2.50$0.525Llama 4 Maverick saves $1.98
10,000 requests
10M in / 3M out
$25.00$5.25Llama 4 Maverick saves $19.75
1M requests/mo
1B in / 300M out
$2500.00$525.00Llama 4 Maverick saves $1975.00

Pros & Cons

Claude Haiku 4.5 Strengths

  • +Higher quality score (31 vs 18)
  • +Lower latency (faster first token)

Llama 4 Maverick Strengths

  • +Cheaper input tokens
  • +Cheaper output tokens
  • +Larger context window (1.0M vs 200K)
  • +Higher max output tokens
  • +Faster output (130 vs 125 tok/s)

When to Use Each Model

Choose Claude Haiku 4.5 for

  • Tasks requiring maximum accuracy and reasoning

Choose Llama 4 Maverick for

  • Budget-conscious projects where cost is the primary factor
  • Long documents, large codebases, or multi-turn conversations
  • Generating long-form content or detailed code
  • Real-time applications, chat, or autocomplete

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Llama 4 Maverick?
For input tokens, Llama 4 Maverick is 3.7x cheaper at $0.27/1M tokens. For output tokens, Llama 4 Maverick is 5.9x cheaper at $0.85/1M tokens. At typical usage (1M input + 300K output), Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $2.50 vs Llama 4 Maverick at $0.525.
What's the context window difference?
Claude Haiku 4.5 supports 200K context (200,000 tokens), while Llama 4 Maverick supports 1.0M (1,048,576 tokens). Llama 4 Maverick can handle 5x more context in a single request.
Which model has better benchmarks?
Quality Index: Claude Haiku 4.5 scores 31 vs Llama 4 Maverick at 18. Speed: Claude Haiku 4.5 generates 125 tok/s vs Llama 4 Maverick at 130 tok/s. Time to first token: Claude Haiku 4.5 at 0.41s vs Llama 4 Maverick at 0.48s.
When should I choose Claude Haiku 4.5 over Llama 4 Maverick?
Choose Claude Haiku 4.5 when you need: Higher quality score (31 vs 18), Lower latency (faster first token). Choose Llama 4 Maverick when you need: Cheaper input tokens, Cheaper output tokens, Larger context window (1.0M vs 200K), Higher max output tokens, Faster output (130 vs 125 tok/s).
How much would 10,000 API requests cost?
At 1K input + 300 output tokens per request (typical chat): Claude Haiku 4.5 = $25.00, Llama 4 Maverick = $5.25. At 10K input + 1K output per request (longer conversations): Claude Haiku 4.5 = $150.00, Llama 4 Maverick = $35.50.

Related Comparisons