Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Llama 4 Maverick
Complete pricing and performance comparison between Anthropic's Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Meta's Llama 4 Maverick.
Quick Verdict
Cheaper
Llama 4 Maverick
11.1x cheaper input, 17.6x cheaper output
Larger Context
Llama 4 Maverick
1.0M vs 200K
Pricing Comparison
| Spec | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | Llama 4 Maverick | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Meta | |
| Input / 1M tokens | $3 | $0.27 | Llama 4 Maverick is 91% more expensive |
| Output / 1M tokens | $15 | $0.85 | Llama 4 Maverick is 94% more expensive |
| Context Window | 200K | 1.0M | 5x difference |
| Max Output | 64K | 16K |
Performance Benchmarks
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | Llama 4 Maverick | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality Index | -- | 18 | N/A |
| Output Speed | -- | 130 tok/s | N/A |
| Value (Quality/$) | -- | 68.1 | Higher = better value |
Benchmark data from Artificial Analysis. Quality Index is a composite score across reasoning, coding, and knowledge tasks.
Cost at Scale
Estimated cost at different usage levels (3:1 input-to-output token ratio, typical for chat).
| Usage | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | Llama 4 Maverick | Savings |
|---|---|---|---|
Single request 1K in / 300 out | $0.0075 | $0.0005 | Llama 4 Maverick saves $0.0070 |
10 requests 10K in / 3K out | $0.075 | $0.0053 | Llama 4 Maverick saves $0.070 |
100 requests 100K in / 30K out | $0.750 | $0.053 | Llama 4 Maverick saves $0.698 |
1,000 requests 1M in / 300K out | $7.50 | $0.525 | Llama 4 Maverick saves $6.97 |
10,000 requests 10M in / 3M out | $75.00 | $5.25 | Llama 4 Maverick saves $69.75 |
1M requests/mo 1B in / 300M out | $7500.00 | $525.00 | Llama 4 Maverick saves $6975.00 |
Pros & Cons
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Strengths
- +Higher max output tokens
Llama 4 Maverick Strengths
- +Cheaper input tokens
- +Cheaper output tokens
- +Larger context window (1.0M vs 200K)
When to Use Each Model
Choose Claude Sonnet 4.5 for
- →Generating long-form content or detailed code
Choose Llama 4 Maverick for
- →Budget-conscious projects where cost is the primary factor
- →Long documents, large codebases, or multi-turn conversations
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Llama 4 Maverick?
For input tokens, Llama 4 Maverick is 11.1x cheaper at $0.27/1M tokens. For output tokens, Llama 4 Maverick is 17.6x cheaper at $0.85/1M tokens. At typical usage (1M input + 300K output), Claude Sonnet 4.5 costs $7.50 vs Llama 4 Maverick at $0.525.
What's the context window difference?
Claude Sonnet 4.5 supports 200K context (200,000 tokens), while Llama 4 Maverick supports 1.0M (1,048,576 tokens). Llama 4 Maverick can handle 5x more context in a single request.
Which model has better benchmarks?
When should I choose Claude Sonnet 4.5 over Llama 4 Maverick?
Choose Claude Sonnet 4.5 when you need: Higher max output tokens. Choose Llama 4 Maverick when you need: Cheaper input tokens, Cheaper output tokens, Larger context window (1.0M vs 200K).
How much would 10,000 API requests cost?
At 1K input + 300 output tokens per request (typical chat): Claude Sonnet 4.5 = $75.00, Llama 4 Maverick = $5.25. At 10K input + 1K output per request (longer conversations): Claude Sonnet 4.5 = $450.00, Llama 4 Maverick = $35.50.
Related Comparisons
Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs GPT-5.4
$3 vs $2.5 per 1M input
GPT-5.4 vs Llama 4 Maverick
$2.5 vs $0.27 per 1M input
Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs GPT-5
$3 vs $1.25 per 1M input
GPT-5 vs Llama 4 Maverick
$1.25 vs $0.27 per 1M input
Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs GPT-5 Mini
$3 vs $0.25 per 1M input
GPT-5 Mini vs Llama 4 Maverick
$0.25 vs $0.27 per 1M input