GPT-4o Mini vs Llama 4 Maverick
Complete pricing and performance comparison between OpenAI's GPT-4o Mini and Meta's Llama 4 Maverick.
Quick Verdict
Cheaper
GPT-4o Mini
1.8x cheaper input, 1.4x cheaper output
Larger Context
Llama 4 Maverick
1.0M vs 128K
Higher Quality
Llama 4 Maverick
Score: 18 vs 13
Faster
Llama 4 Maverick
130 vs 61 tok/s
Pricing Comparison
| Spec | GPT-4o Mini | Llama 4 Maverick | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Meta | |
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.15 | $0.27 | GPT-4o Mini is 44% more expensive |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.6 | $0.85 | GPT-4o Mini is 29% more expensive |
| Context Window | 128K | 1.0M | 8x difference |
| Max Output | 16K | 16K | |
| Tokenizer | o200k_base | cl100k_base |
Performance Benchmarks
| Metric | GPT-4o Mini | Llama 4 Maverick | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality Index | 13 | 18 | Llama 4 Maverick |
| Output Speed | 61 tok/s | 130 tok/s | Llama 4 Maverick |
| Time to First Token | 0.58s | 0.48s | Llama 4 Maverick |
| Value (Quality/$) | 84.0 | 68.1 | Higher = better value |
Benchmark data from Artificial Analysis. Quality Index is a composite score across reasoning, coding, and knowledge tasks.
Cost at Scale
Estimated cost at different usage levels (3:1 input-to-output token ratio, typical for chat).
| Usage | GPT-4o Mini | Llama 4 Maverick | Savings |
|---|---|---|---|
Single request 1K in / 300 out | $0.0003 | $0.0005 | Same |
10 requests 10K in / 3K out | $0.0033 | $0.0053 | GPT-4o Mini saves $0.0020 |
100 requests 100K in / 30K out | $0.033 | $0.053 | GPT-4o Mini saves $0.020 |
1,000 requests 1M in / 300K out | $0.330 | $0.525 | GPT-4o Mini saves $0.195 |
10,000 requests 10M in / 3M out | $3.30 | $5.25 | GPT-4o Mini saves $1.95 |
1M requests/mo 1B in / 300M out | $330.00 | $525.00 | GPT-4o Mini saves $195.00 |
Pros & Cons
GPT-4o Mini Strengths
- +Cheaper input tokens
- +Cheaper output tokens
Llama 4 Maverick Strengths
- +Larger context window (1.0M vs 128K)
- +Faster output (130 vs 61 tok/s)
- +Higher quality score (18 vs 13)
- +Lower latency (faster first token)
When to Use Each Model
Choose GPT-4o Mini for
- →Budget-conscious projects where cost is the primary factor
Choose Llama 4 Maverick for
- →Long documents, large codebases, or multi-turn conversations
- →Tasks requiring maximum accuracy and reasoning
- →Real-time applications, chat, or autocomplete
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GPT-4o Mini or Llama 4 Maverick?
For input tokens, GPT-4o Mini is 1.8x cheaper at $0.15/1M tokens. For output tokens, GPT-4o Mini is 1.4x cheaper at $0.6/1M tokens. At typical usage (1M input + 300K output), GPT-4o Mini costs $0.330 vs Llama 4 Maverick at $0.525.
What's the context window difference?
GPT-4o Mini supports 128K context (128,000 tokens), while Llama 4 Maverick supports 1.0M (1,048,576 tokens). Llama 4 Maverick can handle 8x more context in a single request.
Which model has better benchmarks?
Quality Index: GPT-4o Mini scores 13 vs Llama 4 Maverick at 18. Speed: GPT-4o Mini generates 61 tok/s vs Llama 4 Maverick at 130 tok/s. Time to first token: GPT-4o Mini at 0.58s vs Llama 4 Maverick at 0.48s.
When should I choose GPT-4o Mini over Llama 4 Maverick?
Choose GPT-4o Mini when you need: Cheaper input tokens, Cheaper output tokens. Choose Llama 4 Maverick when you need: Larger context window (1.0M vs 128K), Faster output (130 vs 61 tok/s), Higher quality score (18 vs 13), Lower latency (faster first token).
How much would 10,000 API requests cost?
At 1K input + 300 output tokens per request (typical chat): GPT-4o Mini = $3.30, Llama 4 Maverick = $5.25. At 10K input + 1K output per request (longer conversations): GPT-4o Mini = $21.00, Llama 4 Maverick = $35.50.
Related Comparisons
GPT-4o Mini vs GPT-5.4
$0.15 vs $2.5 per 1M input
GPT-5.4 vs Llama 4 Maverick
$2.5 vs $0.27 per 1M input
GPT-4o Mini vs GPT-5
$0.15 vs $1.25 per 1M input
GPT-5 vs Llama 4 Maverick
$1.25 vs $0.27 per 1M input
GPT-4o Mini vs GPT-5 Mini
$0.15 vs $0.25 per 1M input
GPT-5 Mini vs Llama 4 Maverick
$0.25 vs $0.27 per 1M input