GPT-4o vs Llama 4 Maverick
Complete pricing and performance comparison between OpenAI's GPT-4o and Meta's Llama 4 Maverick.
Quick Verdict
Cheaper
Llama 4 Maverick
9.3x cheaper input, 11.8x cheaper output
Larger Context
Llama 4 Maverick
1.0M vs 128K
Higher Quality
Llama 4 Maverick
Score: 18 vs 17
Faster
GPT-4o
135 vs 130 tok/s
Pricing Comparison
| Spec | GPT-4o | Llama 4 Maverick | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Meta | |
| Input / 1M tokens | $2.5 | $0.27 | Llama 4 Maverick is 89% more expensive |
| Output / 1M tokens | $10 | $0.85 | Llama 4 Maverick is 92% more expensive |
| Context Window | 128K | 1.0M | 8x difference |
| Max Output | 16K | 16K | |
| Tokenizer | o200k_base | cl100k_base |
Performance Benchmarks
| Metric | GPT-4o | Llama 4 Maverick | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality Index | 17 | 18 | Llama 4 Maverick |
| Output Speed | 135 tok/s | 130 tok/s | GPT-4o |
| Time to First Token | 0.53s | 0.48s | Llama 4 Maverick |
| Value (Quality/$) | 6.9 | 68.1 | Higher = better value |
Benchmark data from Artificial Analysis. Quality Index is a composite score across reasoning, coding, and knowledge tasks.
Cost at Scale
Estimated cost at different usage levels (3:1 input-to-output token ratio, typical for chat).
| Usage | GPT-4o | Llama 4 Maverick | Savings |
|---|---|---|---|
Single request 1K in / 300 out | $0.0055 | $0.0005 | Llama 4 Maverick saves $0.0050 |
10 requests 10K in / 3K out | $0.055 | $0.0053 | Llama 4 Maverick saves $0.050 |
100 requests 100K in / 30K out | $0.550 | $0.053 | Llama 4 Maverick saves $0.498 |
1,000 requests 1M in / 300K out | $5.50 | $0.525 | Llama 4 Maverick saves $4.97 |
10,000 requests 10M in / 3M out | $55.00 | $5.25 | Llama 4 Maverick saves $49.75 |
1M requests/mo 1B in / 300M out | $5500.00 | $525.00 | Llama 4 Maverick saves $4975.00 |
Pros & Cons
GPT-4o Strengths
- +Faster output (135 vs 130 tok/s)
Llama 4 Maverick Strengths
- +Cheaper input tokens
- +Cheaper output tokens
- +Larger context window (1.0M vs 128K)
- +Higher quality score (18 vs 17)
- +Lower latency (faster first token)
When to Use Each Model
Choose GPT-4o for
- →Real-time applications, chat, or autocomplete
Choose Llama 4 Maverick for
- →Budget-conscious projects where cost is the primary factor
- →Long documents, large codebases, or multi-turn conversations
- →Tasks requiring maximum accuracy and reasoning
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GPT-4o or Llama 4 Maverick?
For input tokens, Llama 4 Maverick is 9.3x cheaper at $0.27/1M tokens. For output tokens, Llama 4 Maverick is 11.8x cheaper at $0.85/1M tokens. At typical usage (1M input + 300K output), GPT-4o costs $5.50 vs Llama 4 Maverick at $0.525.
What's the context window difference?
GPT-4o supports 128K context (128,000 tokens), while Llama 4 Maverick supports 1.0M (1,048,576 tokens). Llama 4 Maverick can handle 8x more context in a single request.
Which model has better benchmarks?
Quality Index: GPT-4o scores 17 vs Llama 4 Maverick at 18. Speed: GPT-4o generates 135 tok/s vs Llama 4 Maverick at 130 tok/s. Time to first token: GPT-4o at 0.53s vs Llama 4 Maverick at 0.48s.
When should I choose GPT-4o over Llama 4 Maverick?
Choose GPT-4o when you need: Faster output (135 vs 130 tok/s). Choose Llama 4 Maverick when you need: Cheaper input tokens, Cheaper output tokens, Larger context window (1.0M vs 128K), Higher quality score (18 vs 17), Lower latency (faster first token).
How much would 10,000 API requests cost?
At 1K input + 300 output tokens per request (typical chat): GPT-4o = $55.00, Llama 4 Maverick = $5.25. At 10K input + 1K output per request (longer conversations): GPT-4o = $350.00, Llama 4 Maverick = $35.50.