GPT-5.4 Nano vs Llama 4 Maverick
Complete pricing and performance comparison between OpenAI's GPT-5.4 Nano and Meta's Llama 4 Maverick.
Quick Verdict
Cheaper
GPT-5.4 Nano (input) / Llama 4 Maverick (output)
Input: 1.4x diff, Output: 1.5x diff
Larger Context
Llama 4 Maverick
1.0M vs 400K
Pricing Comparison
| Spec | GPT-5.4 Nano | Llama 4 Maverick | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Meta | |
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.2 | $0.27 | GPT-5.4 Nano is 26% more expensive |
| Output / 1M tokens | $1.25 | $0.85 | Llama 4 Maverick is 32% more expensive |
| Context Window | 400K | 1.0M | 3x difference |
| Max Output | 128K | 16K | |
| Tokenizer | o200k_base | cl100k_base |
Performance Benchmarks
| Metric | GPT-5.4 Nano | Llama 4 Maverick | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality Index | -- | 18 | N/A |
| Output Speed | -- | 130 tok/s | N/A |
| Value (Quality/$) | -- | 68.1 | Higher = better value |
Benchmark data from Artificial Analysis. Quality Index is a composite score across reasoning, coding, and knowledge tasks.
Cost at Scale
Estimated cost at different usage levels (3:1 input-to-output token ratio, typical for chat).
| Usage | GPT-5.4 Nano | Llama 4 Maverick | Savings |
|---|---|---|---|
Single request 1K in / 300 out | $0.0006 | $0.0005 | Same |
10 requests 10K in / 3K out | $0.0057 | $0.0053 | Same |
100 requests 100K in / 30K out | $0.058 | $0.053 | Llama 4 Maverick saves $0.0050 |
1,000 requests 1M in / 300K out | $0.575 | $0.525 | Llama 4 Maverick saves $0.050 |
10,000 requests 10M in / 3M out | $5.75 | $5.25 | Llama 4 Maverick saves $0.500 |
1M requests/mo 1B in / 300M out | $575.00 | $525.00 | Llama 4 Maverick saves $50.00 |
Pros & Cons
GPT-5.4 Nano Strengths
- +Cheaper input tokens
- +Higher max output tokens
Llama 4 Maverick Strengths
- +Cheaper output tokens
- +Larger context window (1.0M vs 400K)
When to Use Each Model
Choose GPT-5.4 Nano for
- →Generating long-form content or detailed code
Choose Llama 4 Maverick for
- →Long documents, large codebases, or multi-turn conversations
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.4 Nano or Llama 4 Maverick?
For input tokens, GPT-5.4 Nano is 1.4x cheaper at $0.2/1M tokens. For output tokens, Llama 4 Maverick is 1.5x cheaper at $0.85/1M tokens. At typical usage (1M input + 300K output), GPT-5.4 Nano costs $0.575 vs Llama 4 Maverick at $0.525.
What's the context window difference?
GPT-5.4 Nano supports 400K context (400,000 tokens), while Llama 4 Maverick supports 1.0M (1,048,576 tokens). Llama 4 Maverick can handle 3x more context in a single request.
Which model has better benchmarks?
When should I choose GPT-5.4 Nano over Llama 4 Maverick?
Choose GPT-5.4 Nano when you need: Cheaper input tokens, Higher max output tokens. Choose Llama 4 Maverick when you need: Cheaper output tokens, Larger context window (1.0M vs 400K).
How much would 10,000 API requests cost?
At 1K input + 300 output tokens per request (typical chat): GPT-5.4 Nano = $5.75, Llama 4 Maverick = $5.25. At 10K input + 1K output per request (longer conversations): GPT-5.4 Nano = $32.50, Llama 4 Maverick = $35.50.
Related Comparisons
GPT-5.4 vs GPT-5.4 Nano
$2.5 vs $0.2 per 1M input
GPT-5.4 vs Llama 4 Maverick
$2.5 vs $0.27 per 1M input
GPT-5.4 Mini vs GPT-5.4 Nano
$0.75 vs $0.2 per 1M input
GPT-5.4 Mini vs Llama 4 Maverick
$0.75 vs $0.27 per 1M input
GPT-5 vs GPT-5.4 Nano
$1.25 vs $0.2 per 1M input
GPT-5.4 Nano vs GPT-5 Mini
$0.2 vs $0.25 per 1M input