Skip to main content
TC
TokenCost

Grok 4 vs Llama 4 Maverick

Complete pricing and performance comparison between xAI's Grok 4 and Meta's Llama 4 Maverick.

Quick Verdict

Cheaper
Llama 4 Maverick
11.1x cheaper input, 17.6x cheaper output
Larger Context
Grok 4
2.0M vs 1.0M
Higher Quality
Grok 4
Score: 42 vs 18
Faster
Llama 4 Maverick
130 vs 49 tok/s

Pricing Comparison

SpecGrok 4Llama 4 MaverickDifference
ProviderxAIMeta
Input / 1M tokens$3$0.27Llama 4 Maverick is 91% more expensive
Output / 1M tokens$15$0.85Llama 4 Maverick is 94% more expensive
Context Window2.0M1.0M2x difference
Max Output16K16K

Performance Benchmarks

MetricGrok 4Llama 4 MaverickWinner
Quality Index4218Grok 4
Output Speed49 tok/s130 tok/sLlama 4 Maverick
Time to First Token9.39s0.48sLlama 4 Maverick
Value (Quality/$)13.868.1Higher = better value

Benchmark data from Artificial Analysis. Quality Index is a composite score across reasoning, coding, and knowledge tasks.

Cost at Scale

Estimated cost at different usage levels (3:1 input-to-output token ratio, typical for chat).

UsageGrok 4Llama 4 MaverickSavings
Single request
1K in / 300 out
$0.0075$0.0005Llama 4 Maverick saves $0.0070
10 requests
10K in / 3K out
$0.075$0.0053Llama 4 Maverick saves $0.070
100 requests
100K in / 30K out
$0.750$0.053Llama 4 Maverick saves $0.698
1,000 requests
1M in / 300K out
$7.50$0.525Llama 4 Maverick saves $6.97
10,000 requests
10M in / 3M out
$75.00$5.25Llama 4 Maverick saves $69.75
1M requests/mo
1B in / 300M out
$7500.00$525.00Llama 4 Maverick saves $6975.00

Pros & Cons

Grok 4 Strengths

  • +Larger context window (2.0M vs 1.0M)
  • +Higher quality score (42 vs 18)

Llama 4 Maverick Strengths

  • +Cheaper input tokens
  • +Cheaper output tokens
  • +Faster output (130 vs 49 tok/s)
  • +Lower latency (faster first token)

When to Use Each Model

Choose Grok 4 for

  • Long documents, large codebases, or multi-turn conversations
  • Tasks requiring maximum accuracy and reasoning

Choose Llama 4 Maverick for

  • Budget-conscious projects where cost is the primary factor
  • Real-time applications, chat, or autocomplete

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Grok 4 or Llama 4 Maverick?
For input tokens, Llama 4 Maverick is 11.1x cheaper at $0.27/1M tokens. For output tokens, Llama 4 Maverick is 17.6x cheaper at $0.85/1M tokens. At typical usage (1M input + 300K output), Grok 4 costs $7.50 vs Llama 4 Maverick at $0.525.
What's the context window difference?
Grok 4 supports 2.0M context (2,000,000 tokens), while Llama 4 Maverick supports 1.0M (1,048,576 tokens). Grok 4 can handle 2x more context in a single request.
Which model has better benchmarks?
Quality Index: Grok 4 scores 42 vs Llama 4 Maverick at 18. Speed: Grok 4 generates 49 tok/s vs Llama 4 Maverick at 130 tok/s. Time to first token: Grok 4 at 9.39s vs Llama 4 Maverick at 0.48s.
When should I choose Grok 4 over Llama 4 Maverick?
Choose Grok 4 when you need: Larger context window (2.0M vs 1.0M), Higher quality score (42 vs 18). Choose Llama 4 Maverick when you need: Cheaper input tokens, Cheaper output tokens, Faster output (130 vs 49 tok/s), Lower latency (faster first token).
How much would 10,000 API requests cost?
At 1K input + 300 output tokens per request (typical chat): Grok 4 = $75.00, Llama 4 Maverick = $5.25. At 10K input + 1K output per request (longer conversations): Grok 4 = $450.00, Llama 4 Maverick = $35.50.

Related Comparisons