Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen3.5-9B
Complete pricing and performance comparison between Meta's Llama 4 Maverick and Alibaba's Qwen3.5-9B.
Quick Verdict
Cheaper
Qwen3.5-9B
5.4x cheaper input, 5.7x cheaper output
Larger Context
Llama 4 Maverick
1.0M vs 262K
Pricing Comparison
| Spec | Llama 4 Maverick | Qwen3.5-9B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba | |
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.27 | $0.05 | Qwen3.5-9B is 81% more expensive |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.85 | $0.15 | Qwen3.5-9B is 82% more expensive |
| Context Window | 1.0M | 262K | 4x difference |
| Max Output | 16K | 33K |
Performance Benchmarks
| Metric | Llama 4 Maverick | Qwen3.5-9B | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality Index | 18 | -- | N/A |
| Output Speed | 129 tok/s | -- | N/A |
| Value (Quality/$) | 68.1 | -- | Higher = better value |
Benchmark data from Artificial Analysis. Quality Index is a composite score across reasoning, coding, and knowledge tasks.
Cost at Scale
Estimated cost at different usage levels (3:1 input-to-output token ratio, typical for chat).
| Usage | Llama 4 Maverick | Qwen3.5-9B | Savings |
|---|---|---|---|
Single request 1K in / 300 out | $0.0005 | $0.0001 | Same |
10 requests 10K in / 3K out | $0.0053 | $0.0009 | Qwen3.5-9B saves $0.0043 |
100 requests 100K in / 30K out | $0.053 | $0.0095 | Qwen3.5-9B saves $0.043 |
1,000 requests 1M in / 300K out | $0.525 | $0.095 | Qwen3.5-9B saves $0.430 |
10,000 requests 10M in / 3M out | $5.25 | $0.950 | Qwen3.5-9B saves $4.30 |
1M requests/mo 1B in / 300M out | $525.00 | $95.00 | Qwen3.5-9B saves $430.00 |
Pros & Cons
Llama 4 Maverick Strengths
- +Larger context window (1.0M vs 262K)
Qwen3.5-9B Strengths
- +Cheaper input tokens
- +Cheaper output tokens
- +Higher max output tokens
When to Use Each Model
Choose Llama 4 Maverick for
- →Long documents, large codebases, or multi-turn conversations
Choose Qwen3.5-9B for
- →Budget-conscious projects where cost is the primary factor
- →Generating long-form content or detailed code
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Maverick or Qwen3.5-9B?
For input tokens, Qwen3.5-9B is 5.4x cheaper at $0.05/1M tokens. For output tokens, Qwen3.5-9B is 5.7x cheaper at $0.15/1M tokens. At typical usage (1M input + 300K output), Llama 4 Maverick costs $0.525 vs Qwen3.5-9B at $0.095.
What's the context window difference?
Llama 4 Maverick supports 1.0M context (1,048,576 tokens), while Qwen3.5-9B supports 262K (262,144 tokens). Llama 4 Maverick can handle 4x more context in a single request.
Which model has better benchmarks?
When should I choose Llama 4 Maverick over Qwen3.5-9B?
Choose Llama 4 Maverick when you need: Larger context window (1.0M vs 262K). Choose Qwen3.5-9B when you need: Cheaper input tokens, Cheaper output tokens, Higher max output tokens.
How much would 10,000 API requests cost?
At 1K input + 300 output tokens per request (typical chat): Llama 4 Maverick = $5.25, Qwen3.5-9B = $0.950. At 10K input + 1K output per request (longer conversations): Llama 4 Maverick = $35.50, Qwen3.5-9B = $6.50.
Related Comparisons
GPT-5.4 vs Qwen3.5-9B
$2.5 vs $0.05 per 1M input
GPT-5.4 vs Llama 4 Maverick
$2.5 vs $0.27 per 1M input
GPT-5.4 Mini vs Qwen3.5-9B
$0.75 vs $0.05 per 1M input
GPT-5.4 Mini vs Llama 4 Maverick
$0.75 vs $0.27 per 1M input
GPT-5.4 Nano vs Qwen3.5-9B
$0.2 vs $0.05 per 1M input
GPT-5.4 Nano vs Llama 4 Maverick
$0.2 vs $0.27 per 1M input