Skip to main content
TC
TokenCost

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Llama 4 Maverick

Complete pricing and performance comparison between Google's Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Meta's Llama 4 Maverick.

Quick Verdict

Cheaper
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2.7x cheaper input, 2.1x cheaper output
Larger Context
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
1.0M vs 1.0M
Higher Quality
Llama 4 Maverick
Score: 18 vs 13
Faster
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
336 vs 128 tok/s

Pricing Comparison

SpecGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteLlama 4 MaverickDifference
ProviderGoogleMeta
Input / 1M tokens$0.1$0.27Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is 63% more expensive
Output / 1M tokens$0.4$0.85Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is 53% more expensive
Context Window1.0M1.0MSame
Max Output66K16K

Performance Benchmarks

MetricGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteLlama 4 MaverickWinner
Quality Index1318Llama 4 Maverick
Output Speed336 tok/s128 tok/sGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Time to First Token0.27s0.48sGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Value (Quality/$)127.068.1Higher = better value

Benchmark data from Artificial Analysis. Quality Index is a composite score across reasoning, coding, and knowledge tasks.

Cost at Scale

Estimated cost at different usage levels (3:1 input-to-output token ratio, typical for chat).

UsageGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteLlama 4 MaverickSavings
Single request
1K in / 300 out
$0.0002$0.0005Same
10 requests
10K in / 3K out
$0.0022$0.0053Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite saves $0.0031
100 requests
100K in / 30K out
$0.022$0.053Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite saves $0.031
1,000 requests
1M in / 300K out
$0.220$0.525Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite saves $0.305
10,000 requests
10M in / 3M out
$2.20$5.25Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite saves $3.05
1M requests/mo
1B in / 300M out
$220.00$525.00Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite saves $305.00

Pros & Cons

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Strengths

  • +Cheaper input tokens
  • +Cheaper output tokens
  • +Higher max output tokens
  • +Faster output (336 vs 128 tok/s)
  • +Lower latency (faster first token)

Llama 4 Maverick Strengths

  • +Higher quality score (18 vs 13)

When to Use Each Model

Choose Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite for

  • Budget-conscious projects where cost is the primary factor
  • Generating long-form content or detailed code
  • Real-time applications, chat, or autocomplete

Choose Llama 4 Maverick for

  • Tasks requiring maximum accuracy and reasoning

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite or Llama 4 Maverick?
For input tokens, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is 2.7x cheaper at $0.1/1M tokens. For output tokens, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is 2.1x cheaper at $0.4/1M tokens. At typical usage (1M input + 300K output), Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite costs $0.220 vs Llama 4 Maverick at $0.525.
What's the context window difference?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite supports 1.0M context (1,048,576 tokens), while Llama 4 Maverick supports 1.0M (1,048,576 tokens). Llama 4 Maverick can handle 1x more context in a single request.
Which model has better benchmarks?
Quality Index: Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite scores 13 vs Llama 4 Maverick at 18. Speed: Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite generates 336 tok/s vs Llama 4 Maverick at 128 tok/s. Time to first token: Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite at 0.27s vs Llama 4 Maverick at 0.48s.
When should I choose Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite over Llama 4 Maverick?
Choose Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite when you need: Cheaper input tokens, Cheaper output tokens, Higher max output tokens, Faster output (336 vs 128 tok/s), Lower latency (faster first token). Choose Llama 4 Maverick when you need: Higher quality score (18 vs 13).
How much would 10,000 API requests cost?
At 1K input + 300 output tokens per request (typical chat): Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite = $2.20, Llama 4 Maverick = $5.25. At 10K input + 1K output per request (longer conversations): Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite = $14.00, Llama 4 Maverick = $35.50.

Related Comparisons